COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ULTRASOUND AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGINNG FOR THE EARLY DETECTION OF CRYPTORCHIDISM IN CHILDREN AND ITS CORRELATION WITH ORCHIDOPEXY FINDINGS
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting cryptorchidism in pediatric patients and to compare these imaging modalities with classic orchidopexy findings. Conducted between 2018 and 2019 at the PHI University Institute of Radiology - Skopje in collaboration with the PHI Clinic for Children's Surgery at the Mother Teresa University Clinical Centre - Skopje, this cross-sectional study included pediatric patients up to 14 years old with suspected cryptorchidism. B-mode ultrasound and MRI, including DW-MRI sequences, were employed for localization of undescended testes. These imaging findings were compared with those obtained from classic orchidopexy, serving as the gold standard. A total of 41 male pediatric patients (≤14 years old) with suspected cryptorchidism were enrolled, with a mean age of 6.76±3.74 years. MRI demonstrated superior detection and visualization of undescended testes compared to ultrasound. Specifically, MRI significantly improved the preoperative diagnostic accuracy, especially in localizing non-palpable undescended testes, when compared to ultrasound. The findings suggest that MRI is more effective than ultrasound in detecting undescended testes in pediatric patients. Furthermore, MRI enhances the preoperative diagnostic accuracy, particularly in localizing non-palpable undescended testes, thereby potentially serving as a recommended imaging modality for this purpose.
Keywords: Cryptorchidism, Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diagnostic Accuracy, Orchidopexy, Pediatric Radiology.
References
2. Fritzsche PJ, Hricak H, Kogan BA, et al. Undescended testis: value of MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 164:169–173.
3. Kogan SJ. Cryptorchidism. In: Kelalis PP, King LR, Gelman AB, eds. Clinical pediatric urology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1985:864–887.
4. Kanemoto K, Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of nonpalpable testis. Int J Urol 2005; 12:668–672.
5. Sarihan H, Sari A, Abeş M, et al. Nonpalpable undescended testis: value of magnetic resonance imaging. Minerva Urol Nefrol 1998; 50:233–236.
6. Kucheria R, Sahai A, Sami TA, et al. Laparoscopic management of cryptorchidism in adults. Eur Urol 2005; 48:453–457.
7. Chew G, Hutson JM. Incidence of cryptorchidism and ascending testes in trisomy 21: a 10 year retrospective review. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20:744–747.
8. Cryptorchidism and the value of ultrasonography, M Shoukry, K Pojak, MS Choudhry.
9. Muna AG, Hanon N, Riadh H., (2017), Cryptorchidism: diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with ultrasound. Med J Tikrit Univ 23(1):95–104.
10. Clinical Medical Insights: Reproductive Health. (2015), “Cryptorchism and Fertilityâ€.
11. Pittsburgh Children’s Hospital. (2018), “Undescended Testicle (Testis): Cryptorchidism.
12. Kato T, Kojima Y, Kamisawa H et al (2011) Findings of fat-suppressed T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of non-palpable testes. BJU Int 107(2):290–294.