RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENDODONTIC TAPER AND FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF TOOTH

  • Verica Toneva Stojmenova Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Goce Delcev Stip, North Macedonia
  • Lidija Popovska University Dental Clinical Center, "Mother Theresa", Faculty of Dentistry, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia
  • Vasko Kokalanov Faculty of Computer Science, University Goce Delcev Stip, North Macedonia

Abstract

The distribution of chewing pressure in intact tooth is from crown, across the root dentin and ends in periodontal ligament. Endodontic treatment procedure is dental procedure that is necessary when the pulp tissue is irreversible damaged, because of dental caries, dental disease or traumatic injury.  When the dental structure is weakened, there is a possibility of crown or root fracture. The root vertical fracture is the third most common reason for tooth extraction in endodontic treated tooth.  Endodontic procedure is successful when all the steps of dental procedure is completed. The objective of this study was to estimate whether the low taper of endodontic instrument decreases the possibility of tooth fracture and increase the percentage of tooth fracture resistance. To complete the aim of this study, were analyzed total number of 84 surveys, 42 of them were used for detail analysis.  The electronic research was done using the databases as: Pub Med (Medline), Embase, Medscape, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. This study is based on review on published articles written in English language, reporting results related to the use of different intensity of conicity in endodontic treatment and the influence to tooth fracture resistance. Other inclusion criteria as date parameter of the articles was set from 2000 until 2022.  The research examined in this review is of in vitro studies and FEA analysis. Some results of this research have shown that fracture resistance in endodontic treated tooth depends of quantity of dental structure. In many reviewed studies the evaluated levels of fracture, have been found to be significantly lover in groups of teeth that are endodontic treated with lover conicity, compared with the other groups of teeth that are endodontic treated with high percentage of conicity. Also, The FEA method has been successfully used in endodontics, where it has proven with the in vitro methods of study. 


Key words: Endodontic shaping, tooth fracture, fracture resistance, instrument taper, endodontic instrument, fracture straight.


https://doi.org/10.55302/JMS2361149ts


 

References

1. Tavano KTA, Botelho AM, Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Avila AF, Huebner R. Resistance to fracture of intraradicular posts made of biological materials. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):300.
2. Soares, P. V., Machado, A. C., Zeola, L. F., Souza, P. G., Galvão, A. M., Montes, T. C., Pereira, A. G., Reis, B. R., Coleman, T. A., & Grippo, J. O. (2015). Loading and composite restoration assessment of various non-carious cervical lesions morphologies - 3D finite element analysis. Australian dental journal, 60(3), 309–316.
3. Tikku AP, Chandra A, Bharti R. Are full cast crowns mandatory after endodontic treatment in posterior teeth? J Conserv Dent 2010;13:246-8.
4. Plotino G, Grande NM, Isufi A, Ioppolo P, Pedullà E, Bedini R, Gambarini G, Testarelli L. Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Access Cavity Designs. J Endod. 2017 Jun;43(6):995-1000
5. Тoure B, Faye B, Kane AW, Lo CM, Niang B, Boucher Y. Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: A prospective study. J Endod. 2011;37:1512–5.
6. Kim H.-C., Lee M.-H., Yum J., Versluis A., Lee C.-J., Kim B.-M. Potential Relationship between Design of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments and Vertical Root Fracture. J. Endod. 2010;36:1195–1199.
7. Medha A., Patil S., Hoshing U., Bandekar S. Evaluation of forces generated on three different rotary file systems in apical third of root canal using finite element analysis. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014;8:243–246.
8. Versluis A., Messer H.H., Pintado M.R. Changes in compaction stress distributions in roots resulting from canal preparation. Int. Endod. J. 2006;39:931–939.
9. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions 1967. J Endod. 2006;32:281–90.
10. Clark D., Khademi J.A. Case Studies in Modern Molar Endodontic Access and Directed Dentin Conservation. Dent. Clin. 2010;54:275–289.
11. Lisiak-Myszke, M., Marciniak, D., Bieliński, M., Sobczak, H., Garbacewicz, Ł., & Drogoszewska, B. Application of Finite Element Analysis in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-A Literature Review. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. 13(14), 3063.
12. Schmid, A., Strasser, T., & Rosentritt, M. Finite element analysis of occlusal interferences in dental prosthetics caused by occlusal adjustment. The International journal of prosthodontics, 2021. 10.11607/ijp.7178. Advance online publication.
13. Jiang T, Wu RY, Wang JK, Wang HH, Tang GH. Clear aligners for maxillary anterior en masse retraction: a 3D finite element study. Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 23;10(1):10156.
14.Zheng, Z., He, Y., Ruan, W., Ling, Z., Zheng, C., Gai, Y., & Yan, W. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2021. 125(6), 890–899.
15. Lee, H. E., Lin, C. L., Wang, C. H., Cheng, C. H., & Chang, C. H. (2002). Stresses at the cervical lesion of maxillary premolar--a finite element investigation. Journal of dentistry, 30(7-8), 283–290.
16. Soares, P. V., Machado, A. C., Zeola, L. F., Souza, P. G., Galvão, A. M., Montes, T. C., Pereira, A. G., Reis, B. R., Coleman, T. A., & Grippo, J. O. (2015). Loading and composite restoration assessment of various non-carious cervical lesions morphologies - 3D finite element analysis. Australian dental journal, 60(3), 309–316.
17. Arola, D., Galles, L. A., & Sarubin, M. F. (2001). A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations. Journal of dentistry, 29(1), 63–73.
18. Zogheib C, Sfeir G, Plotino G, Deus G, Daou M, Khalil I. Impact of Minimal Root Canal Taper on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Bicuspids. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;8(2):179-183
19. Clark D., Khademi J.A. Case Studies in Modern Molar Endodontic Access and Directed Dentin Conservation. Dent. Clin. 2010;54:275–289.
20. Munari L.S., Bowles W.R., Fok A.S. Relationship between Canal Enlargement and Fracture Load of Root Dentin Sections. Dent. Mater. 2019;35:818–824.
21. Wu Y, Cathro P, Marino V. Fracture resistance and pattern of the upper premolars with obturated canals and restored endodontic occlusal access cavities. J Biomed Res. 2010 Nov;24(6):474-8.
22. Shi, R., Meng, X., Feng, R., Hong, S., Hu, C., Yang, M., & Jiang, Y. (2022). Stress Distribution and Fracture Resistance of repairing Cracked Tooth with Fiber-reinforced Composites and Onlay. Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc, 48(3), 458–464.
23. Kılıç, Y., Karataşlıoğlu, E., & Kaval, M. E. (2021). The Effect of Root Canal Preparation Size and Taper of Middle Mesial Canals on Fracture Resistance of the Mandibular Molar Teeth: An In Vitro Study. Journal of endodontics, 47(9), 1467–1471.
24. Tian S.Y., Bai W., Jiang W.R., Liang Y.H. Fracture Resistance of Roots in Mandibular Premolars Following Root Canal Instrumentation of Different Sizes. Chin. J. Dent. Res. 2019;22:197–202.
25. Aksoy Ç., Keriş E.Y., Yaman S.D., Ocak M., Geneci F., Çelik H.H. Evaluation of XP-endo Shaper, Reciproc Blue, and ProTaper Universal NiTi Systems on Dentinal Microcrack Formation Using Micro-Computed Tomography. J. Endod. 2019;45:338–342.
26. Zogheib C., Sfeir G., Plotino G., De Deus G., Daou M., Khalil I. Impact of minimal root canal taper on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated bicuspids. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2018;8:179–183.
27. Capar I.D., Altunsoy M., Arslan H., Ertas H., Aydinbelge H.A. Fracture Strength of Roots Instrumented with Self-Adjusting File and the ProTaper Rotary Systems. J. Endod. 2014;40:551–554.
28. Kılıç Y., Karataşlıoğlu E., Kaval M.E. The Effect of Root Canal Preparation Size and Taper of Middle Mesial Canals on Fracture Resistance of the Mandibular Molar Teeth: An In Vitro Study. J. Endod. 2021;47:1467–1471.
29. Yıldız E.D., Fidan M.E., Sakarya R.E., Dinçer B. The effect of taper and apical preparation size on fracture resistance of roots. Aust. Endod. J. 2020;47:67–72.
30. Sabeti M., Kazem M., Dianat O., Bahrololumi N., Beglou A., Rahimipour K., Dehnavi F. Impact of Access Cavity Design and Root Canal Taper on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An Ex Vivo Investigation. J. Endod. 2018;44:1402–1406.
31. Örs S.A., Serper A. Influence of nickel-titanium rotary systems with varying tapers on the biomechanical behaviour of maxillary first premolars under occlusal forces: A finite element analysis study. Int. Endod. J. 2017;51:529–540.
32. Aidasani, G. L., Mulay, S., & Borkar, A. (2020). Comparative evaluation of flexural fracture resistance of mandibular premolars after instrumentation with four different endodontic file systems: An In Vitro study. Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research, 31(5), 701–705.
33. Saber, S. E., Nagy, M. M., & Schäfer, E. (2015). Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. International endodontic journal, 48(1), 109–114.
34. Bürklein, S., Benten, S., & Schäfer, E. (2013). Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. International endodontic journal, 46(6), 590–597.
35. Kfir A., Elkes D., Pawar A., Weissman A., Tsesis I. Incidence of microcracks in maxillary first premolars after instrumentation with three different mechanized file systems: A comparative ex vivo study. Clin. Oral Investig. 2016;21:405–411.
36. Arias A., Lee Y.H., Peters C.I., Gluskin A.H., Peters O. Comparison of 2 Canal Preparation Techniques in the Induction of Microcracks: A Pilot Study with Cadaver Mandibles. J. Endod. 2014;40:982–985.
37. Ceyhanli K.T., Erdilek N., Tatar I., Celik D. Comparison of ProTaper, RaCe and Safesider instruments in the induction of dentinal microcracks: A micro-CT study. Int. Endod. J. 2016;49:684–689.
38. Li S.-H., Lu Y., Song D., Zhou X., Zheng Q.-H., Gao Y., Huang D.-M. Occurrence of Dentinal Microcracks in Severely Curved Root Canals with ProTaper Universal, WaveOne, and ProTaper Next File Systems. J. Endod. 2015;41:1875–1879..
39. Karataş E., Gündüz H.A., Kırıcı D.Ö., Arslan H., Topçu M.Ç., Yeter K.Y. Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and WaveOne instruments. J. Endod. 2015;41:261–264.
40. Clark D., Khademi J., Herbranson E. Fracture resistant endodontic and restorative preparations. Dent. Today. 2013;32:120–123.
41. Steele A, Johnson B. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars. J Endod. 1999;25:6–8.
42. Reeh E, Messer H, Douglas W. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative prodedures. J Endod. 1989;15:512–6.
Published
2023-05-10
How to Cite
TONEVA STOJMENOVA, Verica; POPOVSKA, Lidija; KOKALANOV, Vasko. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENDODONTIC TAPER AND FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF TOOTH. Journal of Morphological Sciences, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 149-155, may 2023. ISSN 2545-4706. Available at: <https://jms.mk/jms/article/view/vol6no1-21>. Date accessed: 27 feb. 2024.
Section
Articles