ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT: REFERENCE RANGE AT 17-25 GESTATIONAL AGE ACCORDING TO ANTHROPOMETRICAL PARAMETERS

Abstract

The screening and management of abnormal fetal growth, whether it be  macrosomia or growth restriction, remain important objectives of  prenatal care.  The measurement of fetal biometry in the second and third trimesters is an important part of these examinations and biometric measurements are combined routinely in order to calculate the estimated fetal weight (EFW)EFW is a useful parameter with which to predict birth weight and outcome when it is calculated a few days before delivery. Total number of fetuses (n=210) according to gestational age were divided in three groups (first group 17-19g.a; second group 20-22g.a and third group 23-25g.a). Each group was divided in subgroups according to the sex criterion. Anthropometrical parameters were measured using methodology of the International Biological Programme (IBP) with standard technique of measurement and equipment. Fetal parameters were analyzed: fetal weight (FW), fetal length (FL), biparietal diameter (BPI), head circumferences, thigh circumferences, Mid Upper arm circumferences, abdominal circumferences, longitudinal and transversal parameters. The fetal weight as a basic characteristic and indicator of the physical growth is of great practical importance because it supplies information whether the fetuses weight is normal for the gestational week or there are some deviations which lead to an abnormal development of the fetus. The results showed that anthropometrical parameters of the fetus were in positive correlations with fetal weight and their values were increased in different groups according to gestational age. Fetal anthropometric models are strongly predictive of actual fetal weight. The need for using measurements of some anthropometrical parameters of the fetus are imposed as sensitive, safe and sample, above all compelling in routine clinical practice.


Key words: fetus, fetal length, fetal weight, anthropometrical parameters.

References

1. Kurjak A, Miljan M., Ginekologija I Perinatologija 1995.
2. Babuta S, Chauhan S, Garg R, Bagarhatta M. Assessment of fetal gestational age in different trimesters from ultrasonographic measurements of various fetal biometric parameters. J Anat Soc India. 2013;62(Suppl 1):40–6.
3. Madan A, Holland S, Humbert JE, Benitz WE. Racial differences in birth weight of term infants in a northern California population. J Perinat. 2002; 22(Suppl 3):230–5.
4. Verburg BO, Steegers EA et all. New chart for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment for fetal growth; longitudinal data from a population-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(4);388-96.
5. Karki DB, Sharma UK et all. Study of accuracy of commonly used fetal parameters for estimation of gestational age. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2006;45(162);233-7.
6. Kinare AS, Chinchwadkar MC, Natekar AS, Coyaji KJ, Wills AK, Joglekar CV, et al. 3. Patterns of fetal growth in a rural Indian cohort and comparison with a Western European population: Data from the Pune maternal nutrition study. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(Suppl 2):215–23.
7. Tarca AL, Hernandez-Andrade E, Ahn H, Garcia M, Xu Z, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Single and serial fetal biometry to detect preterm and term small-and large-for-gestational-age neonates: A longitudinal cohort study. PLoS One. 2016;1(Suppl 11).
8. Kiserud T, Piaggio G, Carroli G, Widmer M, Carvalho J, Jensen LN, et al. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: A multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLoS Med. 2017;14(Suppl 1):e120-200.
9. Žaliūnas B, Bartkevičienė D, Drąsutienė G, Utkus A, Kurmanavičius J. Fetal biometry: Relevance in obstetrical practice. Medicina. 2017;53(Suppl 6):357–64.
10. Fetal ultrasound parameters: Reference values for a local perspective Navita Aggarwal and G L Sharma. 2020; Indian J radiol Imaging 30(2): 149–155.
11. WHO- Fetal Growth Calculator https://srhr.org/fetalgrowthcalculator
12. Sonographic Assessment of Fetal Growth Abnormalities Michelle P. Debbink , Shannon L. Son, Paula J. Woodward. Radio Graphics, 2020 ;Vol 41 (1): 268:288.
13. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth
L.J. Salomon, Z. Alfirevic, F. Da Silva Costa, R.L. Deter, F. Figueras, T. Ghi, P. Glanc, A.,Khalil, W. Lee, R. Napolitano, A. Papageorghiou, A. Sotiriadis, J. Stirnemann, A. Toi, G. Yeo. Ultrasound in obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019 Vol 53(6); 715:723.
14. Trpkovska B. Antropometriski karakteristiki na glavata na fetusot vo vtoriot trimester od intrauteriniot rast. 2008.
15. De Reu PA et all.Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight. J Perinat Med. 2008;36(4);324-9.
16. Tony Evans, Pam Loughna et all. Fetal size and dating: charts recommended for clinical obstetric practice. British Med. Ultrasound society 2009;17(3);161-67.
Published
2022-12-29
How to Cite
TRPKOVSKA, Biljana; ZAFIROVA, Biljana. ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT: REFERENCE RANGE AT 17-25 GESTATIONAL AGE ACCORDING TO ANTHROPOMETRICAL PARAMETERS. Journal of Morphological Sciences, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 3, p. 109-114, dec. 2022. ISSN 2545-4706. Available at: <https://jms.mk/jms/article/view/vol5no3-18>. Date accessed: 09 feb. 2023.
Section
Articles