AGE AS FACTOR IN THE CHANGE OF THE POSITION IN IMPACTED MAXILLARY CANINE
Abstract
Background: Many studies have shown that mesiodistal position of impacted maxillary canine (IMC) gives the best prediction values for orthodontic treatment, or, the closer the impacted canine lies to midline, the poorer is the prognosis for orthodontic alignment.
Aim: The aim of the present study is to classify IMC according to canine crown horizontal overlap with lateral or central incisor's root; to find their correlation with the age of patients with IMC.
Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in 104 patients with IMC who attended several polyclinics and dental ordinations in north-east part of North Macedonia. Patients’ dental records as well as their panoramic radiographs were examined. We used a sector classification by Alesandri et al.
Results: Dominant position of the impacted canines cusps in younger group (from 10-15 years of age), is when it is overlapping with half and a whole width of lateral incisor's root 9 (28,13%) and 17 (53,13%)), consequently. Dominant position in older group (from 15-69 years of age), is when it is overlapping a half and the whole width of central incisor's root 10 (20,41%) and 20 (40,82%), consequently (p=0,00025 sig.).
Conclusion: Early detection of impacted canines and timely start of orthodontic treatment is crucial for successful treatment.
References
2. The etiology of maxillary canine impaction. Jacobs H. Am J Orthop. 1984;84(2):125-32.
3. Incidence of impacted supernumerary teeth-a radiographic study in a North Greek population. Fardi A, Kondylidou-Sidira A, Bashar Z,Parisis N,Tsirlis A. Med Oral Patol Cir Bucal. 2011;16(1):e56-e61.
4. Permanent maxillary canines-review of eruption pattern and local etiological factors leading to impaction. Sajanani AK. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry.2015; 6:1-7
5. Incidence of impacted maxillary canine and association with maxillary lateral incisors anomalies in Ramadi sity. Hekmat Altae Z. Asian journal of science and technology. 2015; 5(3): 226-229.
6. The palatal canine and the adjacent lateral incisors: a study of west of Scotlanad population. Massey PA, Compbell HM, Luffiingham JK. Br J Orthod. 1994; 4(2):169-74
7. Retrospective study of association between displacement of maxillary canine and tooth agenesis. Jang E, Lee K, An S, Song J, Ra J. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39(5):488-92 .
8. Еаrly prediction of maxillary canine impaction from panoramic radiograph. Sajani AK, King NM.J Orthod Dentofacijal Orthop.2012;142(1):45-51
9. Localization of impacted canines.Kumar S, Mehothra P, Phagchandani J, Singh A, Gog A, Shrma A, Yaday H. Journal of Clinical and Dijagnostic Research. 2015;9(1):ze11-ze14
10. Percentiles relative to maxillary permanent canine inclination by age: a radiographic study. Alessandri BG, lanarini M, Danesi M, Parenti SI, Gatto MR. Am J Orthop.2009;136:486.e1-6
11.The assessment of impacted maxillary canine position with panoramic radiography and cone beam CT. Jung YH, Liang H, Benson BW, Flint DJ, Cho BH. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2012;41:356-360
12. A treatment difficulty index for unerupted maxillary canines. Pitt S, Hamdan N, Rock P. Eur J Orthod.2006;28(2):141-144.
13. Impacted permanent maxillary canines: diagnosis and treatment. Abron A, Mendro RL, Kaplan S. N Y State Dent J. 2004;70:24-28.
14. Guidelines for the assessment of the impacted maxillary canine. Counihan K. Dent Update.2013; 40: 770-777.
15. Retrospective analysis of the correlation between the facial biotype and the inclination of the upper canine cusp axis to the occlusal plane. Pacifici L, DeAngelis F, Orefici A, Tatullo M.Oral&Implantology.2016;4(1):1-9
16. Factors associated with duration of forces eruption of impacted maxillary canines: a retrospective study. Zuccati G, Ghobdlu J, Nieri M, Clauser C.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2006;130(3):349-356.
17. Factors influencing the nonsurgical eruption of palattally impacted canines. Olive RJ. Aust OrthodJ.2005;21:95-101.
18. Canine impaction identified early with panoramic radiographs.Lindauer S,Rubensein L,Hang W,Andersen W, Issacson R. J Am Dent Aoc.1992;123:91-2,95-7.
19. Palatally impacted canines and modified index of orthodontic treatment need. Barlow ST, Moore MB, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;31:362-366
20. Success rate and duration for orthodontic treatment of adult’s patients with palatally impacted canine. Backer A, Chaushu S. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2003;124:509-514
