RELATIONSHIP OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EXPRESSION OF MISMATCH REPAIR GENE PRODUCTS AND CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES IN PATIENTS WITH LOW-GRADE ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
Abstract
Background: This study examines the relationship between mismatch repair (MMR) gene expression and clinicopathological features in patients with low-grade endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: A prospective cohort of 40 patients with histologically confirmed low-grade EC underwent immunohistochemical analysis to determine MMR status. Clinical data, including age, body mass index (BMI), menopausal status, parity, and comorbidities, were collected. Histopathological evaluations assessed myometrial invasion,lymphovascular invasion and disease stage. Results: MMR deficiency (MMRd) was identified in 35% of patients, predominantly associated with MLH1/PMS2 loss. No significant associations were found between MMR status and clinical characteristics such as age, BMI, or comorbidities. However, MMRd tumors exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of myometrial invasion over 50% (85.71% vs. 38.46%, p=0.0042) and lymphovascular invasion (71.43% vs. 19.23%, p=0.00114). Additionally, MMRd cases were more frequently associated with advanced disease stages, particularly in stage IIIC (28.57% vs. 7.69%, p=0.078). Conclusion: The importance of MMR status in the biological behavior of low-grade endometrial cancer is highlighted in this study. The strong correlation between MMR deficiency and aggressive histopathological features such as increased myometrial and lymphovascular invasion, highlights the need to integrate MMR testing into clinical practice, even if clinical parameters showed no significant association with MMR expression. These results suggest that MMRd may be a useful prognostic indicator that requires more research to improve patient outcomes and treatment approaches for low-grade endometrial cancer.
Keywords : endometrial cancer, low grade, mismatch repair
References
Liu Y, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature.
2013;497(7447):67–73
2. Helland Å., Børresen-Dale A.-L., Peltomäki P., Hektoen M., Kristensen G.B., Nesland J.M.,
De La Chapelle A., Lothe R.A. Microsatellite instability in cervical and endometrial
carcinomas. Int. J. Cancer. 1997;70:499–501
3. Stelloo E, Jansen AML, Osse EM, Nout RA, Creutzberg CL, Ruano D, et al. Practical guidance
for mismatch repair-deficiency testing in endometrial cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(1):96-102.
4. Mills AM, Longacre TA. Lynch Syndrome Screening in the Gynecologic Tract: Current State
of the Art. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(4):e35-44
5. Vermij L, Smit V, Nout R, Bosse T. Incorporation of molecular characteristics into endometrial
cancer management. Histopathology. 2020;76(1):52-63.
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T,
Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Gonzalez Martin A, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice
P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A,
Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP
guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer.
2021 Jan;31(1):12-39.
7. Cho KR , Cooper K , Croce S , et al International Society of Gynecological Pathologists
(ISGyP) endometrial cancer project: guidelines from the special techniques and ancillary
studies group. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019;38 Suppl 1:S114–22.
8. Crosbie EJ ,Ryan NAJ , Arends MJ , et al The Manchester International Consensus Group
recommendations for the management of gynecological cancers in Lynch syndrome. Genet
Med 2019;21:2390–400
9. Yano M, Ito K, Yabuno A, Ogane N, Katoh T, Miyazawa M, et al. Impact of TP53
immunohistochemistry on the histological grading system for endometrial endometrioid
carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2019;32:1023–1031.
10. McMeekin D.S., Tritchler D.L., Cohn D., Mutch D.G., Lankes H.A., Geller M.A., Powell M.A.,
Backes F.J., Landrum L.M., Zaino R., et al. Clinicopathologic Significance of Mismatch Repair
Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J.
Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:3062–3068.
11. Shikama A., Minaguchi T., Matsumoto K., Akiyama-Abe A., Nakamura Y., Michikami H.,
Nakao S., Sakurai M., Ochi H., Onuki M., et al. Clinicopathologic implications of DNA
mismatch repair status in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol. Oncol. 2016;140:226–233.
12. Cosgrove C.M., Cohn D., Hampel H., Frankel W.L., Jones D., McElroy J.P., Suarez A.A., Zhao
W., Chen W., Salani R., et al. Epigenetic silencing of MLH1 in endometrial cancers is
associated with larger tumor volume, increased rate of lymph node positivity and reduced
recurrence-free survival. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017;146:588–595.
13. Carr C., Son J., Yao M., Priyadarshini A., Marquard J., Vargas R., Michener C., AlHilli M.M.
Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of endometrial Cancer patients with mismatch
repair deficiency in the era of universal Lynch syndrome screening. Gynecol.
Oncol. 2020;159:712–720.
14. Pasanen A., Loukovaara M., Bützow R. Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA
mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in endometrioid endometrial
carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 2020;33:1443–1452.
15. Kim S.R., Tone A., Kim R.H., Cesari M., Clarke B.A., Eiriksson L., Hart T., Aronson M.,
Holter S., Lytwyn A., et al. Understanding the clinical implication of mismatch repair
deficiency in endometrioid endometrial cancer through a prospective study. Gynecol.
Oncol. 2021;161:221–227.
16. Doghri R., Houcine Y., Boujelbène N., Driss M., Charfi L., Abbes I., Mrad K., Sellami R.
Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Endometrial Cancer, Immunohistochemistry Staining and
Clinical Implications. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2019;27:678–682.
17. Saijo M., Nakamura K., Ida N., Nasu A., Yoshino T., Masuyama H., Yanai H. Histologic
Appearance and Immunohistochemistry of DNA Mismatch Repair Protein and p53 in
Endometrial Carcinosarcoma: Impact on Prognosis and Insights Into Tumorigenesis. Am. J.
Surg. Pathol. 2019;43:1493–1500.
18. Kolehmainen A.M., Pasanen A.M., Koivisto-Korander R.L., Bützow R.C., Loukovaara M.J.
Molecular characterization in the prediction of disease extent in endometrial carcinoma. Eur. J.
Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod Biol. 2021;256:478–483
19. Allo G., Bernardini M.Q., Wu R.-C., Shih I.-M., Kalloger S., Pollett A., Gilks C.B., Clarke
B.A. ARID1A loss correlates with mismatch repair deficiency and intact p53 expression in
high-grade endometrial carcinomas. Mod. Pathol. 2014;27:255–261.
20. Chu M.M.-Y., Liu S.S., Tam K.-F., Ip P.P.-C., Cheung A.N.-Y., Ngan H.Y.-S. The Significance
of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Young Patients With Endometrial Cancer. Int. J. Gynecol.
Pathol. 2015;34:403–410.
21. Kolehmainen A.M., Pasanen A.M., Koivisto-Korander R.L., Bützow R.C., Loukovaara M.J.
Molecular characterization in the prediction of disease extent in endometrial carcinoma. Eur. J.
Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod Biol. 2021;256:478–483.
22. Rekhi B., Menon S., Deodhar K.K., Ghosh J., Chopra S., Maheshwari A. Clinicopathological
features of 50 mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient endometrial carcinomas, tested by
immunohistochemistry: A single institutional feasibility study, India. Ann. Diagn
Pathol. 2020;47:151558.
23. An H.J., Kim K.I., Kim J.Y., Shim J.Y., Kang H., Kim T.H., Kim J.K., Jeong J.K., Lee S.Y.,
Kim S.J. Microsatellite instability in endometrioid type endometrial adenocarcinoma is
associated with poor prognostic indicators. Am. J. Surg Pathol. 2007;31:846–853.Tangjitgamol
S., Kittisiam T., Tanvanich S. Prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair gene defect
in endometrial cancer patients. Tumour. Biol. 2017;39:1010428317725834.
24. Tangjitgamol S., Kittisiam T., Tanvanich S. Prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair
gene defect in endometrial cancer patients. Tumour. Biol. 2017;39:1010.