• Edvard Jordan Janev Department of oral surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, „Ss. Cyril and Methodius” University, Skopje R. North Macedonia
  • Daniel Josifov University Dental Clinic Center „St. Pantelejmon” , Skopje, R.of North Macedonia
  • Nadica Janeva Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University „Ss. Cyril and Methodius” Skopje R. of North Macedonia



Usually, full arch reconstruction of edentulous ridges requires six to ten dental implants. However, some patients demanding fixed implant-supported prostheses are not able to medically or economically afford complex bone grafts or a greater number of implants. These clinical situations could lead the treatment plan toward the all-on-4 protocol. Four dental implant treatment concept offers a reliable solution for patients looking to escape the discomfort that so often comes from wearing a removable denture, or those with a failing dentition who do not want to spend even a day without teeth. Designed to further help clinicians utilize a graftless approach and achieve cortical or bicortical anchorage where bone quality and quantity are limited. Costs for both the doctor and the patient are reduced because less surgical time and fewer products are used. Nevertheless, due to less implant support in this treatment option, mechanical and biological complications might arise.This study describes the treatment of two separate cases a fully edentulous patients, one in maxilla and one in mandibula with fixed implant-supported prostheses on four dental implants.

Keywords: Full arch rehabilitation, edentulous jaw, implant-supported dental prosthesis


1.Stanford C., DDS, PhD., All on four- where are we now. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 29[2] [2014].
2.Taruna M., Prosthodontic prespective to All on 4concept for dental implants. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 8[10]: ZE16-ZE19 [2014].
3.Bevilacqua M., Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Load Transmission Using Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths., The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 21[6]: [2008].
4.Begg T., Stress Patterns Around Distal Angled Implants in the All-on-Four Concept Configuration, The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants., 24[4]: [2009].
5.Flemming Isidor., Influence of forces on periimplant bone, Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 17 [Suppl. 2]: 8–18 [2006].
6.Sheets J.L., Wilcox C., Wilwerding T. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants. J Prosthodont. 2008. February;17[2]:92–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Hebel K.S., Gajjar R.C. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1997. January;77[1]:28–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Maló P., de Araújo Nobre M., Lopes A., Francischone C., Rigolizzo M. “All-on-4” immediate-function concept for completely edentulous maxillae: a clinical report on the medium [3 years] and long-term [5 years] outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012. May;14 Suppl
9. Grandi T., Immediate loading of four [all-on-4] post- extractive implants supporting mandibular cross-arch fixed prostheses: 18-month follow-up from a multicentre prospective cohort study, Eur J Oral Implantology 5 [3]: 277–285 [2012].
10.Maló P., DDS., All-on-4 Immediate Function Concept with Branemark System® Implants for Completely Edentulous Maxillae: A 1-Year Retrospective Clinical Study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume 7, Supplement 1, 2005.
11.Maló P., DDS., All-on-4 Immediate Function Concept with Branemark System® Implants for Completely Edentulous mandibles: A Retrospective Clinical Study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume 5, Supplement 1, 2003.
12.Charles T. A. Babbush., The All-on-Four Immediate Function Treatment Concept With Nobel Active Implants: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Oral Implantology. Vol. XXXVII/No. Four/2011.
13. Saadat F., Mosharraf R. Prosthetic management of an extensive maxillary alveolar defect with an implant-supported restoration. J Dent [Tehran]. 2013. May;10[3]:256–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
14.Nematollahi F., Beyabanaki E., Alikhasi M. Cement Selection for Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Literature Review. J Prosthodontic. 2016. October;25[7]:599–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
15.Dumbrigue H.B., Abanomi A.A., Cheng L.L. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations. J Prosthetic Dent. 2002. January;87[1]:112–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
16.Misch C.E. The Completely Edentulous Mandible: Treatment Plans for Fixed Restorations, in: Dental Implant Prosthetics. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby, 2015:605–12. [Google Scholar]
17.Misch C.E. Maxillary Arch Implant Considerations: Treatment Plans for Partial and Complete Edentulous Fixed and Overdenture Prostheses, in: Dental Implant Prosthetics. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby, 2015:625–6. [Google Scholar].
18.Emms M., Tredwin C.J., Setchell D.J., Moles D.R. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodontic. 2007. Jan-Feb;16(1):3–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
19.Karl M., Winter W., Taylor T.D., Heckmann S.M. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004. Jan-Feb;19(1):30–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
How to Cite
JANEV, Edvard Jordan; JOSIFOV, Daniel; JANEVA, Nadica. FULL ARCH REHABILITATION WITH 4 DENTAL IMPLANTS (CASE REPORT). Journal of Morphological Sciences, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 3, p. 31-39, dec. 2020. ISSN 2545-4706. Available at: <http://jms.mk/jms/article/view/155>. Date accessed: 28 jan. 2021.