IMPORTANCE OF PAIN DURATION PRIOR PAIN RELIEF TREATMENT WITH CT-GUIDED PERIRADICULAR THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LUMBAR PAIN

  • Dimitar Veljanovski PHI City General Hospital "8-mi Septemvri", Skopje, R. North Macedonia
  • Biljana Prgova PHI City General Hospital "8-mi Septemvri", Skopje, Faculty of Medicine, Ss.Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R. North Macedonia
  • Masha Kostova PHI City General Hospital "8-mi Septemvri", Skopje,Faculty of Medicine, Ss.Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R. North Macedonia
  • Daniela Ristikj-Stomnaroska PHI City General Hospital "8-mi Septemvri", Skopje, Faculty of Medicine, Ss.Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R. North Macedonia
  • Sandra Dejanova PHI City General Hospital "8-mi Septemvri", Skopje, R. North Macedonia
  • Violeta Vasilevska Nikodinovska Faculty of Medicine, Ss.Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R. North Macedonia

Abstract

CT-guided periradicular therapy (PRT) is a minimally invasive interventional technique for treatment of chronic lumbar pain. Aim: To investigate importance of pain duration before PRT treatment in patients with chronic lumbar pain and radiculopathy, with clinical effectiveness assessment. A prospective follow-up CT guided PRT study was done in 166 patients divided into 4 groups according duration of pain before intervention (<3 months, 4-6months, 7-12months, >1year). Degree of pain intensity was determined according to VAS scale. Improvement degree was excellent, good, moderate, or weak.Good clinical response was defined when improvement is greater or equal to 50% on VAS scale, and functional improvement was equal to 40% in the reduction of the ODI index. Follow-up was done at 2nd weeks, 3 and 6 months. Good response was observed in 51.8% of the cases after 2 weeks, 54.2% after 3 months and 59% after 6 months. ODI index parameters was greater or equal to 40% in 22.2% after 2 weeks, 13.8% after 3 months, and 8.4% after 6 months.After 6 months in patients with pain duration up to 3 months, the improvement was excellent in 41(74.5%), moderate in 3(5.4%), good in 6(10.9%) and weak in 4(7.2%) patients in contrast to patients with pain over one year who showed excellent improvement in only 2(5.7%) patients, moderate in 11(31.4%), good in 6(17.1%) and weak in 16 (45.7%) patients. PRT is clinically effective with better clinical outcomein patients with shorter duration of symptoms.


Keywords: chronic lumbar pain, radiculopathy, CT guided, interventional, steroids

References

1. Chou R. Low back pain (chronic). BMJ ClinEvid. 2010; 2010: 1116.
2. Palmer W E. Spinal injections for pain management. Radiology. 2016; 281 (3): 669–88.
3. Fenster AJ, Fernandes K, Brook AL, Miller T. The safety of CT-guided epidural steroid injections in an older
patient cohort. Pain Physician. 2016; 19 (8): E1139-E1146.
4. Allegri M, Montella S, Salici F, et al. Mechanisms of low back pain: a guide for diagnosis and therapy.
F1000Res. 2016; 5: F1000 Faculty Rev-1530.
5. Vianin M. Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index. J Chiropr Med.
2008;7(4):161-163.
6. Spijker-Huiges A, Groenhof F, Winters JC, van Wijhe M, Groenier KH, van der Meer K. Radiating low back pain
in general practice: Incidence, prevalence, diagnosis, and long-term clinical course of illness. Scand J Prim
Health Care. 2015; 33 (1): 27–32.
7. Driscoll T, Jacklyn G, Orchard J, et al. The global burden of occupationally related low back pain: estimates
from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73 (6): 975-981
8. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Bakhit CE, Fellows B. Interventional techniques in the management of chronic pain:
Part 1.0. Pain Physician. 2000; 3 (1): 7-42
9. Marcia S, Zini C, Hirsch JA, Chandra RV, Bellini M. Steroids spinal injections. SeminInterventRadiol. 2018; 35
(4): 290-8.
10. Gossner J. Safety of CT-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations. Analysis of a two-year period. IntervNeuroradiol. 2014; 20 (5): 533-7
11. Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, Falco FJ. Transforaminal epidural injections in chronic lumbar disc herniation: a randomized, double-blind, active-control trial. Pain Physician. 2014; 17 (4): E489-E501
12. Eckel TS, Bartynski WS. Epidural steroid injections and selective nerve root blocks. Tech VascIntervRadiol. 2009; 12: 11–21.
13. Olmarker K, Størkson R, Berge OG. Pathogenesis of sciatic pain: A study of spontaneous behavior in rats exposed to experimental disc herniation. Spine 2002; 27: 1312–7.
14. Murata Y, Onda A, Rydevik B, Takahashi K, Olmarker K. Distribution and appearance of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the dorsal root ganglion exposed experimental disc herniation in rats. Spine 2004; 29: 2235–41.
15. Koboyashi S, Baba H, Uchida K, et al. Effect of mechanical compression on the lumbar nerve root: Localization and changes of intraradicular inflammatory cytokines, nitric oxide, and cyclooxygenase. Spine 2005; 30: 1699–705.
16. Riew KD, Yin Y, Gilula L, et al. The effect of nerve root injections on the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82-A (11): 1589–93.
17. Reiw KD, Park JB, Cho YS, et al. Nerve root blocks in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (8): 1722–5.
18. Karppinen J, Ohinmaa A, Malmivaara A, et al. Cost effectiveness of periradicular infiltration for sciatica: Subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Spine 2001; 26 (23): 2587–95.
19. MacVicar J, King W, Landers MH, Bogduk N. The effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal injection of steroids: A comprehensive review with systematic analysis of the published data. Pain Med 2013; 14 (1): 14–28.
20. Ghahreman A, Ferch R, Bogduk N. The efficacy of transforaminal injection of steroids for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. Pain Med. 2010; 11 (8): 1149-1168
21. Kaufmann TJ, Geske JR, Murthy NS, et al. Clinical effectiveness of single lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Med. 2013; 14 (8): 1126-1133.
22. Şencan S, Çelenlioğlu AE, Asadov R, Gündüz OH. Predictive factors for treatment success of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in lumbar disc herniation-induced sciatica. Turk J Med Sci. 2020; 50 (1): 126-131.
23. Cyteval C, Fescquet N, Thomas E, Decoux E, Blotman F et al. Predictive factors of efficacyofperiradicularcorticosteroidinjectionsforlumbarradiculopathy.AmJNeuroradiol. 2006; 27 (5): 978-982.
24. Ekedahl H, Jonsson B, Annertz M, Frobell RB. The 1-year results of lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with chronic unilateral radicular pain: the relation to MRI findings and clinical features. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 96 (9): 654-662.
25. Ng L, Chaudhary N, Sell P. The efficacy of corticosteroids in periradicular infiltration for chronic radicular pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Spine 2005; 30: 857–62
26. Vad VB, Bhat AL, Lutz GE, et al. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a prospective randomized study. Spine 2002; 27: 11–16
27. Lutz G, Vad V, Wisneski R. Fluoroscopic transforaminal lumbar epidural steroids: an outcome study. ArchPhysMedRehabil. 1998;79(11): 1362-6.
28. Karppinen J, Malmivaara A, Kurunlahti M, et al. Periradicular infiltration for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial. Spine 2001; 26: 1059 –67
29. Rydevik B, Brown MD, Lundborg G. Pathoanatomy and pathophysiology of nerve root compression. Spine 1984; 9: 7–15
30. De Souza Grava AL, Ferrari LF, Defino HL. Cytokine inhibition and time-related influence of inflammatory stimuli on the hyperalgesia induced by the nucleus pulposus. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21 (3): 537-545.
31. DePalma MJ, Bhargava A, Slipman CW. A critical appraisal of the evidence for selective nerve root injection in the treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 1477–83.
Published
2021-07-26
How to Cite
VELJANOVSKI, Dimitar et al. IMPORTANCE OF PAIN DURATION PRIOR PAIN RELIEF TREATMENT WITH CT-GUIDED PERIRADICULAR THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LUMBAR PAIN. Journal of Morphological Sciences, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 94-102, july 2021. ISSN 2545-4706. Available at: <https://jms.mk/jms/article/view/247>. Date accessed: 29 sep. 2021.
Section
Articles